Violence in Video Games

Padmé

King in the North & King Anakin's Wench
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
24,259
Reaction score
2,242
Location
Scotland/Belgium
Yeah I hate all this, ban movie and game violence kind of thing. I hate the fact that people are treated like primative apes that will copy whatever they see on the screen, and like children have to be told not to see it. When I was a young child I was not banned from my mum to watch violent and bloody movies, but she would always explain to me that it wasn't real etc And I can assure you I never once ran out the house with an axe trying to cut people up.

The whole violence issue has been blown way out of proportion. The most violent thing in real life is the news, and I dont think that should be censored either.

I'm sure there are many people who were inspired by games and movies to do bad things, but at the end of the day, nut cases will read into anything.

Like the Beatles "White Album" and Charles Manson. Did people demand that album to be banned? No

Or the book "Cather in the Rye" which inspired Mark Chapman to murder John Lennon

Or.... The Bible? Which has caused more deaths than movies, games and other books put together. But no one asks these to be censored.....
 

Storm Eagle

Master of the Ninja Guild
Joined
Jul 17, 2006
Messages
653
Reaction score
31
Location
Kirkland, WA
I personally think that all video game violence is for added effect. Violence in gaming has been around for a long time, and technically, if these guys had thier way, Mario would take his precious time jumping over the Goombas and making a treaty with Bowser than hitting them on the head and Bowser falling into a pit of lava all the time. Just saying, it's pretty pathetic when all they have to do is look at themselves and they see that they are the real influence, not some crackpot five minute game.
 

BBallForLife

New Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2006
Messages
750
Reaction score
13
Location
NYC
The violence in the Bible is not even described. Although mentioned, it is a small part of the main goal of the Bible, and that is to teach us in the ways of our Lord. To ban the Bible is to ban Christianity.

Also, I agree with King Eduardo. The other week, I heard about a boy killing and dismembering his mother. You don't find that in video games. :)
 

Celestial Wanderer

searching for peace...
Joined
Nov 6, 2004
Messages
322
Reaction score
9
Location
Singapore
Yah, violence existed waaay before video gaming...like it did before bombs and machine guns..i'm for banning guns and bombs, andvideo games which show boys dismembering other ppl..there is bold line btw entertaining and plain sick..
 

Crusader

Disturber of the Peace
Joined
Aug 10, 2003
Messages
12,265
Reaction score
91
Location
Englands Green and Pleasant Lands
I thought of an innteresting idea yesterday for someone to shove in jack thompsons face.

He goes on and on about videogames being 'murder simulators' training children to become murderers.

Obviously its an idiot notion because theres a big difference between pressing the A button to shoot and the B button to reload, and operating a real gun. also motivation plays a key role, people dont just become murderers because they know how.


Anyway heres the thing jack, what about actors? they go through training and choreography, theyre taugvht how to fight, taught how to realistically use weapons and set on a task to 'kill' the bad guys, and whats more theyre PAID to do it.

Whatever shaky psychology jack has behind his murder simulator idea falls flat on its face after that idea.
 

HumanInfiltrator

The Book club lady
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
18
Location
In hope
That is why at one stage they were trying to implement this ban on play guns that where to realistic or life-like. Have you ever heard anything so ridiculous? The reason was, surprisingly, not violent behavior in children, no, some bright spark robbed a bank using a very realistic plastic toy, and got away. He left the plastic gun infront of the bank.
 

Mububban

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 12, 2003
Messages
4,714
Reaction score
147
Location
West Australia
Well cops have killed kids wielding toy guns. If someone points a gun shaped object at a cop, expect to get killed and be questioned later.
 

SunBane

New Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2006
Messages
305
Reaction score
4
Location
Spanktown, NJ
IMO, video games aren't violent enough, or at least the violence doesn't look realistic enough. For example, I recently saw on TV a bull rider who's ear and most of the skin on the side of his head was torn off. Although you might expect something like the skin and ear and hair fully visible and completely mangled on the grouns while blood was blood was shooting out of his head and the skull itself was visible IF this happened in a video game, in real life it's less graphic yet more horrifying. the side of his head was just covered in blood, his hair on the one side was all matted and wet, and towards the back of his head you could just see some sort of red flap. The scary part was that he was in so much pain all over his body from what the bull did to him that he didn't reallize what happened till he place his hand on his head. But in a video game or most movies, the guy would have been running around screaming and stuff till he fainted. Also, you never see dry blood in video games. It's always either splattered or pouring out and then it either goes away or stains the walls and floor after a while. As for the violence of actually killing and beating up enemies, game developers really aren't that creative. I mean, sure, hitting a guy over the head with a baseball bat is ok, but what about stabbing someone with a broken mercury thermometer? Or perhaps picking up a handful of glass shards and smacking someone in the face with them? One more thing, electrocution in video games. Most of the time you just see someone shaking a lot and maybe u'll see a bit of smoke afterwards, but that doesn't really (or at least not always) happen in real life. When someone gets electrocuted, and not just a quick powerful shock, their entire body goes numb, they're either shaking or not moving at all, and they foam at the mouth (this depends all on how madly they get elctrocuted, though). Also, I'm pretty sure their eyes role back. So, I'm not satisfiec with the violence in video games, but for much different reasons than Jack Thompson. As for actually promoting violence in real life, that's a load of bull. Maybe if people played video games more often, they wouldn't feel a need to kill others since they wont even want to bother coming in contact with other human beings =P
 

Justice

New Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
1,260
Reaction score
16
Location
Southern California
It all depends on the person.

Seriously.

I've been around "Violence in Games" since before some of you were even born I am sure.

"Mortal Kombat" was the first. The idea that a game would show blood fly from an opponent was mortifying to older generations. Now they have games in which skin can peel from bones.

But the games aren't necessarily the problem. It's the people playing them, and the fact that everyone wants to blame everything BUT the person responsible.

People smoke. They know it's bad for them, yet they do it anyways. Is it the tobacco companies fault? No. Do the tobacco companies make a harmful product? Yes. So does McDonald's, Pizza Hut, Coca-Cola, Aunt Jemimah, Dreyer's Ice Cream, hell, everything is bad for you these days. But we all have the choice NOT to indulge in them, or if we do, do it moderately.

When children get immersed in video games, some take it WAAAAAAY too far. I know guys who spend more on video games than they did on their car. If they had a really crappy car like mine that'd be one thing, but I'm talking expensive cars.

And some people are just not the types to be playing cruel and graphic video games. You know who I'm talking about, Emo types, the pale, all black attired kids who think like is out to get them and how depressed they always are despite the fact they probably have a nice family and a big house in a suburban area. They also wear those skin tight pants that cling very tightly to their skinny legs that make me want to barf. Those types. Those are the ones with mental probelsm which probably shouldn't spend all their time playing "Columbine Interactive" online.

I don't care what games kids play. They still need to be held accountable for their actions.
 

OrcShaman

Star Trek addict
Joined
Mar 26, 2005
Messages
3,024
Reaction score
23
Location
Romania
I agree, Justice.

As Chris Tucker said: "Whatever happened to crazy?". That kid that dismembered his mom didn't do it cuz he saw that in a game, he did it because he was CRAZY.
For instance, many of us saw "Silence of the lambs" but none of us is making a costume out of our neighbour's skin, for christ's sake! Or if you're playing WoW or any other RPG you're not going to chop your family's heads off with an axe because it was fun when you did it ingame.

Crazy people will watch shopping channel and then go on a killing spree. Cuz they're...well...crazy :)
 

Crusader

Disturber of the Peace
Joined
Aug 10, 2003
Messages
12,265
Reaction score
91
Location
Englands Green and Pleasant Lands
Personally i cant wait to see what kind of response the columbine simulation games elicit from anti-game fanatics like jack thompson.

Lucky all kind of regulatory measures against games get shot down, and rightly so, its the responsibility of parents to govern what their children watch and play, not the government.
 

Dwimmerlaik

Captain of Despair
Joined
Sep 19, 2005
Messages
5,752
Reaction score
31
Location
Angmar (aka. GA)
its all about how the kid was brougth up. ( i was at a gaming arena, and there was a kid who couldnt play counter strike. and i think if he couldnt play cs the parents are thinking he will go kill kids at school if he plays that.)

if the kid knows that its just a game then he/she will be fine. but crazy kids that dont know the difference will do wrong and "act" out the games.
 

Boadicea

Warrior Queen
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Messages
1,436
Reaction score
62
Location
Colorado
It all depends on the person.

Seriously.

I've been around "Violence in Games" since before some of you were even born I am sure.

"Mortal Kombat" was the first. The idea that a game would show blood fly from an opponent was mortifying to older generations. Now they have games in which skin can peel from bones.

But the games aren't necessarily the problem. It's the people playing them, and the fact that everyone wants to blame everything BUT the person responsible.

And some people are just not the types to be playing cruel and graphic video games. You know who I'm talking about, Emo types, the pale, all black attired kids who think like is out to get them and how depressed they always are despite the fact they probably have a nice family and a big house in a suburban area. They also wear those skin tight pants that cling very tightly to their skinny legs that make me want to barf. Those types. Those are the ones with mental probelsm which probably shouldn't spend all their time playing "Columbine Interactive" online.

True, but are you saying that the ONLY thing to point fingers at is the people themselves? What about the parents? They live in the same house, they should have some idea if their child has a sick and twisted mind and the urge to kill people and commit suicide.

And who says that having a family and a big house in a suburb is nice? No offense to anyone who lives in a pleasant suburb, I'm sure you're happy to live where you do. But these kinds of neighborhoods don't work for everybody. Many kids feel trapped in this kind of community, and they look for ways to escape, mostly through drugs and video games. The parents should make sure that their children are happy, and NOT by giving them Grand Theft Auto for Christmas.

The truth is, society has negative effects on these people, and they need to be shown that there is another way out. My old vaulting coach was born naturally aggressive, and he was the kind of person who could have gone very wrong. But early on in life, his parents introduced him to vaulting (gymnastics on horses), and he got so addicted to it, that he put his aggressive energy into practicing and working out at the gym. He did have a few minor tangles with the law, and he used to be a real jerk. But he's in his late 20's now, owns his own performing troupe and is actually a nice guy.

Given, there will always be a few sickos that no one and nothing can turn around. People are responsible for their own actions, but that doesn't mean that most of them can't be helped.

Please pardon my rambling and beotching, guys. I'm really burned up about that Columbine game, and that guy who shot up the college in Montreal right now.
 
Last edited:

Anakin

God Emperor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
35,991
Reaction score
2,645
Location
Belgium
I just found this article...it might not be new to you. I have to translate it so pls my appogly for the poor english.

"In Philadelphia the 25-year old Tyrone Spellman stands trial for the murder on his 17 months year old daughter. The girl accidentally pulled his Xbox 360 down when she was playing with the controller. When the man saw his beloved console into pieces on the floor, he smacked the baby in her face en threw her against a chair. She was instantly dead.

First Spellman claimed his daughter fell out of bed, but the autopsy showed that her skull was completely crushed. The research also showed that the baby probably was walking around with a broken arm for more than a week. "

Now I know this doesn't prove that she died because he was a violent man because of video games. But yeah he was violent and his X-box seemed more precious to him than his daughter. So maybe he was already violent and his "beloved" X-box just made it worse, or maybe it's because it's not cheap equipment and he would have done the same thing with any other expensive equipment she would have accidently broke.
 

New Posts

Top