Uh oh... http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/n...questions-over-the-lockerbie-bombers-release/ In some memorandums leaked by Wikileaks, an online publication instrumental in exposing many failures of the Bush and Obama administration in the War on Terror, some new information has emerged. Mostly, it's about coverups of civilian casualties caused by the US, France, Poland, and Britain. That much is not really new. What is new are memos suggesting the Obama White House, who appeared angered and indignant over the release of the Lockerbie bomber Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, was secretly telling the Scottish government if they were going to release him, to just set him free and not have him jailed in Libya. The Sunday Times revealed, Freeing the bomber. Over 270 people died in the Lockerbie bombing, most of them Americans. If this does not turn into a huge story, I do not know what scandal the media will ever hold against Obama, especially something as big as the White House pretending to do all it can to keep the Lockerbie bomber in jail, while at the same time telling Scotland to just go ahead and let him go. In the meantime, many of the left leaning media sources are pointing out the suspected BP - Lockerbie scandal. An investigation into this scandal has been going on for quite some time. Regardless, one would have to wonder what the public would feel, if a company that has acted on bad faith like BP did something else scandalous, or if the White House has shown, and not for the first time, it gives one face to the public, but behind the scenes works to the exact opposite of their original premise. Megrahi, who was released on compassionate grounds that he was dying of terminal testicular caner and had only months to live, seems to have made a full recovery and is living happily in Libya right now. I'm just wondering if any heads, Obama included, will roll for this.